Inovasi Perangkat Layanan Bimbingan Klasikal Untuk Meningkatkan Sikap Jujur Pada Siswa
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to develop and test the acceptability of classical guidance service tools to increase honesty in junior high school students. The model that is used as a reference in this classical guidance service development research is the 4D model proposed by Thiagarajan which consists of 4 stages, namely define, design, develop, and distribute. This classical guidance service tool innovation was created to assist counseling guidance teachers in increasing students' honesty in providing counseling guidance services in schools. The results of this study indicate that the classical guidance service tool is said to be valid by involving 5 experts. The effectiveness test of the classical guidance service was carried out with a total of 31 students using the pretest-posttest control group design. Calculation of the T-test obtained a high significance value. Thus, the classical guidance service tool is effective in increasing students' honesty.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
References
Rochmawati, N. (2018). Peran Guru dan Orang Tum Membentuk Karakter Jujur Pada Anak. Studi Dan Penelitian Pendidikan Islam, 1, 1–12
Santoso, D., & Yanti, H. B. (2016). Pengaruh Perilaku Tidak Jujur Dan Kompetensi Moral Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik (Academic Fraud) Mahasiswa Akuntansi. Jurnal Akuntansi Trisakti, 3(1), 57. https://doi.org/10.25105/jat.v3i1.4915
Sultonurohmah, N. (2017). Strategi Penanaman Nilai Karakter Jujur dan Disiplin Siswa. Jurnal Al-Ibtida’, 5(2), 1–21.
Thiagarajan. (1976). Thiagarajan, Sivasailam; And Others Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook. Indiana Univ., Bloomington. Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped. National Center for Improvement of Educational System.
Wiggins, G. (2011). A true test: Toward more authentic and equitable assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 92(7), 81–93. https://doi.org/10.1177/003172171109200721