Pengembangan Instrumen Skala Self-Management pada siswa SMP

Main Article Content

Zulfi Qomariah
I Ketut Gading
Gede Nugraha Sudarsana

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian ini dilakukan untuk mengetahui kelayakan instrumen Self Management. Pengumpulan data dilakukan dengan metode survei angket, responden dalam penelitian ini adalah 200 responden yang diambil secara acak dari SMP N 1 Serririt, SMP N 1 Banjar, dan SMP Laboraturium Undiksha. Uji validitas isi dalam penelitian Penelitian ini menggunakan rumus Losche, CVR=1 dan CVI=1. Uji validitas butir dalam penelitian ini memberikan nilai rxy sebesar 0,33, diperoleh 40 butir soal yang valid, dan menggunakan rumus Alpha Krombach untuk memberikan hasil reliabilitas dan menerima hasil. 0,85 memiliki kategori reliabilitas sangat tinggi. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut maka instrumen self management dikatakan layak digunakan.


Abstract:


The purpose of this study was to determine the feasibility of the Self Management instrument. The data was collected using a questionnaire survey method, the respondents in this study were 200 respondents who were taken randomly from SMP N 1 Serririt, SMP N 1 Banjar, and SMP Laboraturium Undiksha. The content validity test in this study used the Losche formula, CVR=1 and CVI=1. The item validity test in this study gave an rxy value of 0.33, obtained 40 valid items, and used the Alpha Krombach formula to provide reliability results and accept the results. 0.85 has a very high reliability category. Based on these results, the self-management instrument is said to be feasible to use.


 

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Arikunto, S. (2010). Metode Penelitian. Rineka cipta.
Cole, C. L., & Bambara, L. M. (1992). Issues surrounding the use of self-management interventions in the schools. School Psychology Review.
Dantes, N. (2012). Metode Penelitian. In P. Christian (Ed.), Research Methods (1st ed.). C.V ANDI OFFSET (Penerbit ANDI).
Goleman, D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence. Bantam Books, Inc. https://psycnet.apa.org/record/1995-98387-000
Gie, The Liang. 2000. Cara Belajar yang Baik bagi Mahasiswa edisi kedua. Yogyakarta: Gadjah Mada University Press.
Kanfer, F. H., & Gaelick-Buys, L. (1991). Self-Management Methods. In F. H. Kanfer & A. P. Goldstein (Eds.), Pergamon general psychology series, Vol. 52. Helping people change: A textbook of methods (pp. 305-360). Elmsford, NY, US: Pergamon Press.
Manz, C. C. (1986). Self-leadership: Toward an expanded theory of self-influence processes in organizations. The Academy of Management Review.11(3): 585–600. https://doi.org/10.2307/258312
Muchlas samani & Hariyanto. Konsep dan model pendidikan karakter. (Bandung: PT.Remaja Rosdakarya.2011), h.43
Sudijono. (2010). Metode Penelitian. Rajawali Pers.
Suhartini, H. (1992). Pengaruh Metode Pengelolaan Diri Sendiri terhadap Prestasi Kerja Praktek Harian. Jurnal Psikologi. 1: 25-30. http://i-lib.ugm.ac.id/jurnal/detail.php?dataId=4107
Lawshe, C. H. (1975). a Quantitative Approach To Content Validity. Personnel Psychology, 28(4), 563–575. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1975.tb01393.x
Lutfi, Fauzan. 2009. Praktik Teknik Konseling Self management. Malang : OPFIkipMalang.
Winkel, WS dan MM Sri Hastuti. 2004. Bimbingan dan Konseling di Institusi Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Media Abadi.
Zainudin. (2011). Pentingnya adversity Quotient Dalam Meraih Prestasi belajar. Guru Membangun, 26(2), 1–10