IMPLEMENTASI CONCURSUS REALIS TINDAK PIDANA PEMBUNUHAN DISERTAI PENGANIAYAAN ( STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 194/ PID.B / 2015 / PN.SGR)
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study aims to analyze the application of the concursus realist concept in the study of Decision No.194/PID.B /2015/PN.SGR at the Singaraja District Court and to analyze the factors causing the application of concursus realis in the study of Decision No.194/PID.B/2015/ PN.SGR at the Singaraja District Court against the crime of murder and persecution in the jurisdiction of Buleleng. This type of empirical juridical research is used in this study. This research is descriptive in nature. The location of this research is at the Singaraja District Court. Data were collected through observation, interviews and documentation studies which later the data obtained would be analyzed descriptively qualitatively. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it can be seen that the analysis of the application of the Concursus Realist concept in sentencing the perpetrators of murder accompanied by abuse (study of Decision No.194/Pid.B/2015/PN.Sgr) of the accused Putu Widhiyasa alias Kencerut was legally proven to have committed the crime of murder accompanied by persecution simultaneously and at the same time or simultaneously with Gede Purwa Husada and to Putu Suarjana. Study of Decision No. 194/PID.B/2015/PN.SGR has fulfilled the elements in the public prosecutor's indictment contained in Article 338 of the Criminal Code (KUHP) and Article 351 Paragraph (2) of the Criminal Code (KUHP) which is carried out concurrently and has the same basic punishment, then the elements of concursus realis are also fulfilled in Article 65 of the Criminal Code (KUHP). Factors causing the application of concursus Realists include the judge's consideration factor, the Public Prosecutor's indictment factor, the expert's consideration factor and the factor of the existence of two criminal acts that were committed concurrently
Article Details
References
Efendi, Jonaedi dan Jhonny Ibrahim (2016). Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Depok: Prenadamedia Group.
Lubis, Solly. (1989). Landasan dan Teknik Perundang-Undangan. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju.
Manan, Bagir. (1992). Dasar-Dasar Pertimbangan Undang-Undangan Indonesia. Jakarta: Ind-Hill.co
Mulyana, A. O., & Lukitasari, D. Penerapan Aturan Perbutan Berlanjut dalam Putusan Perkara
Prasetyo, Tegu. (2011). Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada. Prihasti, L. Y. (2018). Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Yang Disertai Dengan Perkosaan Dan Pencurian
Yang Dilakukan Oleh Anak Mengakibatkan Matinya Para Anak Pekuwaly, U. L. (2012). Potret reformasi hukum di Indonesia pasca reformasi tahun 1998. Masalah-
Masalah Hukum, 41(1), 153-159. Korban. Jurnal Panorama Hukum,
Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Nomor 194/ PID.B / 2015 / PN.SGR
Ramdhan, M. (2021). Metode penelitian. Surabaya: Cipta Media Nusantara. Sandie, K. (2017). Urgensi Ancaman Pidana Kerja Sosial (Community Service Order) Terhadap Tindak Pidana Ringan Dalam Ruu Kuhp Nasional (Suatu Studi Sistem Pemidanaan dalam Perspektif Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana) (Doctoral dissertation, University of
Muhammadiyah Malang). 3(1), 73-86.
Saleh, Sirajuddin (2017). Analisis Data Kualitatif. Bandung: Pustaka
Ramadhan
Surbakti, S. d. (2017). Hukum Pidana: Dasar-Dasar Hukum Pidana Berdasarkam KUHP dan RUU KUHP. Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.
Soesilo, R. (2013). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) serta Komentar-Komentarnya. Bogor: Politeia.
Undang-Undang Dasar Republik Indonesia 1945
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 1946 Tentang Hukum Pidana (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 127 Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 1660.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 Tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 76 Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia 3209)
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomo
48 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman (Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 2009 Nomor 157 Tambahan Lembaran Negara Republik Indonesia Nomor 5076)
Vera, N. L. P., & Ainuddin, N. (2016). Logika Hukum Dan Terobosan Hukum Melalui Legal Reasoning. Jatiswara, 31(1), 99-110.