EFEKTIVITAS PELAKSANAAN MEDIASI MENURUT PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2016 DALAM PERKARA WANPRESTASI DI PENGADILAN NEGERI SINGARAJA

Isi Artikel Utama

Betari Anggi Angraini
Komang Febrinayanti D Dantes
Muhamad Jodi Setianto

Abstrak

This study aims to examine and analyze the effectiveness of the mediation of civil cases by the panel of judges of the Singaraja District Court based on perma no. 1 of 2016. The purpose of this thesis is to determine the implementation of mediation of civil cases in the Singaraja District Court, to understand the opportunities and obstacles of mediation in the Singaraja District Court as well as to analyze the effectiveness of mediation in the Singaraja District Court. The type of research used is Empirical Legal Research. The data and data sources used are primary data and secondary data The data collection techniques used are literature studies, interviews, and field studies. The sampling technique used is Purposive Sampling. The results of this study show that every mediation implementation in the Singaraja District Court is in accordance with the procedures written in perma no. 1 of 2016. Factors that can hinder the chances of success of a mediation in the Singaraja District Court are the lack of support of the litigants, parties do not attend after a summons is made, so that the obligation to resolve disputes through mediation cannot be resolved or carried out.the connection in this study is that judges in mediators at the Singaraja District Court can evaluate the implementation of mediation carried out in court. To the parties to the dispute or related to prioritize peace in resolving problems.

Rincian Artikel

Bagian
Articles

Referensi

Abbas, S. (2009). Mediasi Dalam Perspektif Hukum Syari'ah, Hukum Adat, dan Hukum Nasional. Jakarta: Kencana.
Dantes, K. F., & Adnyani, N. K. S. (2020). Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Debitur Yang Melakukan Wanprestasi Terhadap Objek Jaminan Fidusia Ditinjau Dari Undang-Undang Nomor 42 Tahun 1999 Tentang Jaminan Fidusia. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 3(3), 271-282.
Kusen, S. A. (2016). Hakekat Keberadaan Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan Negeri. Lex Crimen, 5(6), Vol. V.
Mertokusumo, S. (1979). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia . Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Nugraha, I. M. J. W., Dantes, K. F., & Suastika, I. N. (2022). Upaya Penyelesaian Wanprestasi Yang Dilakukan Pelanggan Terhadap Pt. Mensana Dalam Perjanjian Jual Beli Obat Ternak Di Pt. Mensana. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 5(1), 209-219.
Ompusunggu, I. G. (2020). Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan. Lex Crimen Vol. IX, 72.
Puspitaningrum, S. (2018). Mediasi Sebagai Upaya Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata Di Pengadilan. Spektrum Hukum, 15(2),Vol. 15, 275-299.
Subekti. (1977). Hukum Acara Perdata. Bandung: Bina Cipta.

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan
Undang Undang Dasar 1945
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) No. 2 Tahun 2003 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) No. 1 Tahun 2008 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan.
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) No. 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan.
Herziene Inlandsch Reglement (HIR) Pasal 130 dan Rechtreglement voor de Buitengewesten (RBg) Pasal 154
Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung (SEMA) No. 1 Tahun 2002 tentang Pemberdayaan Pengadilan Tingkat Pertama Menerapkan Lemabaga Damai.