THE EFFECTS OF PATTERN TECHNIQUE ON THE STUDENTS’ WRITING COMPETENCY VIEWED FROM TEXT TYPES

Main Article Content

I.G.A. Wirayuda
D.K. Tantra
N.M. Ratminingsih

Abstract

The current research’s objective was to analyze the effect of Pattern Technique on the seventh grade students’ writing competency across text types in the Junior High School. This research used Two-Control-Group Experimental Design with a 2 x 2 factorial arrangement. The research population included all the seventh grade students in Sekolah Menengah Pertama Widya Sakti Denpasar. Two classes were sampled randomly selected and randomly assigned to the experimental and control groups. Data on the students’ writing competency was collected by means of writing performance assessment as the only instrument. Data were analyzed firstly descriptively using measures of central tendency and dispersion. Further analysis was conducted inferentially using One-Way ANOVA. The research findings showed that Pattern Technique had significant effect on the seventh grade students’ descriptive and recount writing competency (F-ratio=41.228; Fcv=0.01). The Pattern Technique effected differently on the students’ writing competency when they wrote descriptive and Recount texts. The research findings implied the necessity to provide EFL learning processes with an effective tool, so that the students have a scaffolding or a pattern in describing and narrating people, animals, objects, experiences, accidents, or incidents etc. It also implied to the EFL teachers to minimize dominance in the learning processes and resort to students’ creativity and involvement.

Article Details

Section
Articles

References

Alonso, & McCabe. (2003). Thematic Patterningtechnique helped studentsin writing.
Angelou, M. (1989). Conversations with Maya Angelou. In S. o. English. Jackson : University Press of Mississippi.
Ary, D. Jacob, L.C. Sorensen, C. and Razavieh, A. (2010). Introduction to Research in Education. USA: Wardsworth.
Asri, N. R. (2013). An Analysis of Thematic Progression in High School Students’ Exposition Texts. English Education Study Program, Indonesia University of Education Bandung, 1(1), 65–74.
Bello-Osagie, V. M., Iliya, B., & Rueben, M. (2018). Cohesion and Thematic Patttern in ABC, Yola Radio Interview. Angewandte Chemie International Edition, 6(11), 951–952., 1, 0.
Boyatzis, R. R. (1998). Transforming Qualitative Information: Thematic Analysis and Code Development. CA: Sage.38.
Butt, D., Fahey, R., Feez, S., Spinks, S., & Yallop, C. (2000). Using Functional Grammar: An Explorer’s Guide [Book Review]. In National Center For English Language and Research. (Second, Vol. 5, Issue 2). Published and distributed by the National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research Macquarie.
Campbell, & Stanley. (1975). How To Design and Evaluate Research in Education. In Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews, 29(4), Campbell and Stanley (1975). How To Design and Eva.
Candiasa.I.M. (2011). Pengujian Instrument Penelitian Disertai Aplikasi dengan Item, Bigsteps dan SPSS. Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Danes, F. (1974). Functional Sentence Perspective and the Organization of the Text. Papers on Functional Sentence Perspective, Prague: Academia. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783111676524.106
Dennis E. Hinkle, William Wiersma, S. G. J. (1979). Applied Statistics for the Behavioral Science. MA: Honghton Mifflin Company.
Ebrahimi, & Khedri. (2018). TheImportanceof Thematic Structure in Students’ Writing Cohesion. Sohar University.
Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2012). How to Design and Evaluate (p. 642).
Gardner, R. C., & Lambert, W. E. (1972). Attitudes and motivation in second language learning. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
Ghadessy. (1995). Thematic Developmentand its Relationship to Registersand Genres. ThematicDevelopmentanditsRelationshiptoRegistersand Genres: 129-145, 129–145.
Halliday. (1985). No TitleTheme and Rheme in the Thematic Organization of the Text. Available at Www.Asian-Efl-Journal.Com/March_ 07_lw.Php Accessed on 15th September 2011., 3(3), 401.
Kerlinger, F. N. (1993). Foudations of Behaviour Research (p. 756).
Kurniasih, I., & Sani, B. (2014). Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 Konsep dan Penerapan. Kementrian Pendidikan Dan Kebudayaan, 1–162.
Langan, J., & Albright, Z. L. (2013). Exploring Writing Paragraph and Essay. In Copyright (Ed.), McGraw-Hill (Fourth Edi, Vol. 53, Issue 9). McGraw-Hill,.
Montgomery, D. C. (2013). Design and Analysis of Experiments Eighth Edition. Arizona State University. In Copyright (Vol. 2009, Issue 2005).
Muthoharoh, S. (2014). a Discourse Analysis on Thematic Progression Patterns Found in “ Opinion ” Articles in Jakarta Post Newspaper Thesis Siti Muthoharoh English Language and Letters Department Faculty of Humanities. xii.
Nurdianingsih, F., & Purnama, Y. I. (2017). Thematic Progression Pattern : a Technique To Improve Students’ Writing Skill Viewed From Writing Apprehension. In Script Journal: Journal of Linguistic and English Teaching (Vol. 2, Issue 2) 58. https://doi.org/10.24903/sj.v2i2.128
Nwogu, N. K. (1995). Structuring Scientific Discourse: Using the “Given-New” Perspective. Teaching English Forum Online, 33, 4.
Oshima, A., Hogue, A., & Oshima, A. (2007). Introduction to academic English.
Paltridge, B. (2000). Making SenseOf Discourse Analysis. Morino, Lithographic.p,140.
Sukarno. (2017). Topic Development and Thematic Patterns. 26(3), 315–327.
To, V. (2018). Thematic Structure in Reading Comprehension Texts in English Textbooks. International Journal of Languages, Literature and Linguistics, 4(1), 45–51. https://doi.org/10.18178/ijlll.2018.4.1.148
Winch Christhoper. (2011). Reading, Writing and Reasoning A Guide for Student (Third Edit). McGraw-Hill Education. enquiries@openupco.uk