Relationship of Situational Leadership, Work Discipline, and Organizational Commitment to Teacher Performance at Cluster IV Elementary School, Buleleng District
Abstract
The problem in this study is whether there is a relationship between situational leadership, work discipline, and organizational commitment to the performance of teachers in Elementary School Group IV, Buleleng District. The purpose of this study was to determine the magnitude of the relationship of situational leadership, work discipline, and organizational commitment to the performance of teachers in Elementary School Cluster IV Buleleng District. This study is an "ex-post facto" study with a large sample of 59 people. Data collected by questionnaire and document. Data analysis was performed using simple regression techniques, multiple regression, and partial correlation. The results showed that: 1) there was a significant relationship between situational leadership and the performance of elementary school teachers in Group IV, Buleleng District, with a correlation coefficient of 0.651 and an effective contribution of 28.18%. 2) there is a significant relationship between work discipline on the performance of teachers in Elementary School Group IV, Buleleng District. with a correlation coefficient of 0.534 and an effective contribution of 13.08%. 3) there is a significant relationship between organizational commitment to the performance of teachers in Elementary School Cluster IV, Buleleng District, with a correlation coefficient of 0.520 and an effective contribution of 11.74%. 4) together, there is a significant relationship between situational leadership, work discipline, and organizational commitment to the performance of teachers in Elementary School Cluster IV, Buleleng District, with a dual correlation coefficient of 0.728 and its contribution of 53% to the performance of Elementary School Cluster IV teachers in Buleleng District. It can be concluded that there is a significant relationship between situational leadership, work discipline, and organizational commitment to the performance of elementary school teachers in Cluster IV Buleleng District.
References
Agung, A. A. Gede. 2014. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Malang: Aditya Media Publishing.
Agung, A. A. Gede. 2018. Metodologi Penelitian Kuantitatif (Perspektif Manajemen Pendidikan). Singaraja: Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha.
Arikunto, S. 1997. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Yogyakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Greenberg dan Baron, 1993. Pengertian Kedisiplinan. Online. Terdapat pada: http://jurnal-sdm.blogspot.com. Diakses pada tanggal 23 Mei 2019.
Hamzah, B. Uno. 2007. Teori Motivasi dan Pengukurannya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksana.
Handoko, H. 1998. Metode-Metode Penilaian Kinerja. Yogyakarta : BPFE-Yogyakarta.
Jumatra, I Wayan. 2016. Hubungan Kedisiplinan, Motivasi Kerja, dan Kelengkapan Perangkat Pembelajaran Terhadap Kinerja Guru SMP Negeri 3 Denpasar. e Jurnal Program Studi Administrasi Pendidikan. Program Pascasarjana Undiksha. Vol 5, No 1.
Nitisemito, Alex S. 2009. Wawasan Studi Kelayakan dan Evaluasi Proyek.Bumi Aksara Nitisemito: Jakarta.
Puspita, dkk. 2017. Pengaruh Keterlibatan Kerja (Job Involvement) dan Kepuasan Kerja (Job Satisfaction) Terhadap Komitmen Organisasi Pegawai Pusdikbang SDM Perum Perhutani Madiun. The 9th FIPA: Forum Ilmiah Pendidikan Akuntansi – Universitas PGRI MadiunVol. 5 No. 1 Hlmn. 364-380.
Sahertian, P.A. 2000. Konsep Dasar Dan Teknik Supervisi Pendidikan (Dalam Rangka Pengembangan Sumber Daya Manusia). Jakarta: rineka Cipta
Subekti, Heru, 2008. Disiplin Kerja. Online. Terdapat pada:http: // subekti-heru.blogspot.com. Diakses pada tanggal 23 Mei 2019.
